Plotbook

Free tool, no signup

The record your COI needs is already public.

Pick the kind of centre of influence and the niche they work, and get the specific public-record pattern that confirms their client did the thing that professional gets paid to handle, how to know the overlap is real, and how a first touch opens once it is.

Each one sees a different money-moving event, and some leave a much thinner public trail than others.

One phrase. This is what sharpens a generic profession into a specific record pattern.

Registry, recorder, and court practice are state-specific.

Describe the profession and niche generically and leave real names and firms out. Your input is sent to our AI provider to write the playbook and is not used to build a profile of anyone.

Pick the professional type and the niche they work. You will get the public-record pattern that confirms their client did the thing they get paid for, how to know it is real, and how a first touch opens once it is.

Why this one is different

It names the record, not a vague synergy

A CPA's clients form and dissolve entities. A lender's clients release liens. An estate attorney's clients fund trusts. Each profession has a specific record pattern behind the money-moving event it handles, and this names it instead of offering generic COI advice that could apply to any profession.

It is honest about the thin cases

A real estate agent already knows about their own closings, so the deed tells them nothing new. A divorce docket confirms a case exists while its terms are usually sealed. The tool says so instead of manufacturing an angle where the public-record overlap is genuinely weak.

It never drafts outreach

Plotbook has no sending, dialing, or sequencing of any kind, and that is deliberate. This tool describes what a real first touch says, leading with the observation and a narrow ask, and refuses to write anything that reads as a message you could copy and send.

It corrects the shared-name mistake

A record and a COI's client sharing a name is not the same as a confirmed overlap, especially on a common name. The dead ends name this mistake directly, because it is the one that turns a promising method into an awkward conversation.

How to use it

  1. 01

    Pick the profession and their niche

    A CPA who works restaurant owners and one who works tech founders are watching for different records, even though the profession-level pattern starts the same way.

  2. 02

    Add the state and territory

    Registry, recorder, and court practice are state-specific, and a territory sharpens which county offices are actually in play.

  3. 03

    Confirm the overlap, then open with the observation

    Use the confirmation signals before treating a record as proof, then open the conversation the way the final step describes: leading with what you noticed, not a pitch.

A COI already saw it. The record just corroborates it

The pitch for working centres of influence is usually framed as access: they meet people you do not. The public-record angle is narrower and more useful than that framing suggests. It is not about getting introduced to a COI's whole book. It is about the moment a specific client of theirs did the thing that professional gets paid to handle, and that moment, for a meaningful share of professions, leaves a record somewhere a COI is not necessarily watching.

A CPA files the return but does not routinely check the state business registry for what happened to the entity afterward. A lender closes the loan but does not track the UCC-1 termination that shows the borrower paid it off early with something else's proceeds. That gap, between what a professional handled and what the public record shows happened next, is where a specific, well-timed conversation starts instead of a generic one about referral partnerships.

What a real first touch actually says

The failure mode in COI outreach is not usually tone, it is genericness. A message that could have been sent to any CPA about any client reads like exactly what it is, and gets exactly the response it deserves.

A first touch that works leads with the specific thing you noticed and where you noticed it: an entity change, a recorded transfer, a docket entry, named plainly rather than hinted at. It says why you are mentioning it now rather than pretending the timing is a coincidence. And it makes one narrow ask, something the other person can answer in a sentence, not an invitation to a call or a pitch for a partnership. That structure is what this tool writes for each profession. The specific words are yours, because the moment it becomes a script is the moment it reads like one.

Where this overlap runs out

Not every professional relationship generates a public record, and pretending otherwise is how COI outreach turns into spam. Most personal-lines insurance clients, most routine estate planning updates, most day-to-day accounting work never touches a recordable instrument at all. The method here works on the subset of events that do, entity changes, recorded transfers, lien releases, court filings, and says nothing useful about the much larger subset that does not.

The other honest limit is the shared-name problem. A record and a COI's client sharing a name is a lead, not a confirmation, especially for a common name in a large county. Treating that coincidence as proof is the fastest way to turn a promising angle into an awkward, wrong conversation.

What this tool does not do

  • It does not look up any professional, client, firm, or record, and it holds no data about any of them.
  • It cannot tell you whether a specific COI relationship or a specific client event exists.
  • It has no data on referral rates, conversion, or how often any profession refers clients, and states none as fact.
  • It does not draft outreach. Plotbook does not send, dial, or sequence anything, and this tool will not write a message you can copy and send.
  • It is not legal, tax, or compliance advice, and it does not determine what outreach your own compliance obligations permit.
  • Record availability and what is sealed or public vary by state and county, and change over time.
  • It gives no contact details, no wealth estimate, and no list of centres of influence to contact.

Questions

More free tools

Liquidity Event Playbook

Pick the kind of wealth event and get the public-record trail it leaves, how long the record takes to appear, and what looks like confirmation but is not.

Open tool

Deed Entity Decoder

Paste the owner name from a deed and find out what kind of entity it is and how to reach the human behind it.

Open tool

SEC Marketing Rule Checker

Paste a LinkedIn post, bio, or website section and see what a compliance reviewer would flag under the SEC Marketing Rule.

Open tool

Stop doing this by hand

Plotbook is a map of who owns the wealth around you, with research that names the human behind an LLC or trust. Seven day trial, 100 credits, no demo call.

Start a free trial