Plotbook

Free tool, no signup

A wealth event leaves a trail. Usually a late one.

Pick the kind of event and get the public records that would confirm it, roughly how long each takes to appear, the signals that corroborate it, and the things that look like confirmation and are not.

Each leaves a different trail. A public company sale is documented; a private one often is not.

Registry, recorder, and probate rules are state-specific, and twelve states do not publish sale prices.

Industry, rough size, timing, and how you heard all change which record is worth checking first. Do not include names.

Describe the situation generically and leave names out. Your input is sent to our AI provider to write the playbook and is not used to build a profile of anyone.

Pick an event type and you will get the public records that would confirm it, how long each takes to appear, the signals that corroborate it, and the things that look like confirmation but are not.

Why this one is different

It tells you when the record shows up

Almost every record here appears on a lag, and the lag differs by system. A registry change can trail a closing by months and an assessor record trails the recorder by its own cycle. Checking too early and finding nothing is the most common way this research produces a false negative.

It says when there is no trail

A private company sale can close with no public announcement at all, and a settlement amount is usually sealed. The tool names those cases rather than inventing a method that cannot work, which is the more useful answer even though it is the less satisfying one.

It never claims an event happened

You have a hypothesis. The tool describes how you would test it against public records. It holds no data about any company, deal, or person, and it will not confirm one for you.

The dead ends are the point

A trade-press item recycling a rumour, a registry amendment that is administrative rather than a sale, an entity name change that means nothing. Each of these reads as confirmation to somebody in a hurry, and each is named.

How to use it

  1. 01

    Pick the event type

    A public offering and a private sale are not the same research problem. One is documented by mandatory filings, the other may leave nothing but a lender releasing its collateral.

  2. 02

    Add the state and what you know

    Registry, recorder, and probate practice are state-specific. Industry, rough size, and when you think it happened all change which record is worth checking first. Leave names out.

  3. 03

    Work the trail, then corroborate

    One record is a hypothesis. Use the confirmation signals before you treat an event as real, and read the dead ends before you treat an apparent answer as an answer.

The lag is the thing nobody accounts for

Public records are not a feed. Every system in this playbook publishes on its own cycle, and the gap between an event and its record is frequently longer than the window in which the research would have been useful.

A deed is recorded within days of closing in some counties and weeks in others, and the assessor's roll then updates on an annual or semi-annual cycle behind that. A business registry reflects a change when somebody files it, which may be at the next annual report rather than at the transaction. Probate opens weeks after a death and runs for a year or more. The practical consequence is that checking once and finding nothing is not a result. Knowing the expected lag for the record you are checking is what turns a null finding into information rather than a dead end.

Corroboration, not the single source

It is easy to find one thing that fits the story you already believe. A registry amendment, a LinkedIn change, a mention in a local business journal. Any one of them is consistent with a sale and equally consistent with something mundane.

An event is worth acting on when independent systems agree: a registry change and a property transfer in the same window, or a filing and a lender's release of collateral. This is the same discipline the entity research tools apply to identifying a person, and for the same reason. One weak match is a hypothesis, and treating a hypothesis as a fact is how prospect research turns into fiction. It is also why Plotbook reports how far a research run actually got rather than always returning an answer.

What this tool does not do

  • It does not look up any company, person, filing, or transaction, and it holds no data about any of them.
  • It cannot tell you whether a specific event happened, or what any deal was worth.
  • It does not know a given county's or state's current publication practice, which varies and changes.
  • It gives no contact details, no wealth estimate, and no valuation.
  • It does not access SEC filings, court dockets, or registries. It explains where they are.
  • Settlement amounts, private deal terms, and trust contents are usually not public at all, and no method makes them so.
  • It is not legal, tax, or investment advice, and it does not address what outreach your own compliance obligations permit.

Questions

More free tools

Deed Entity Decoder

Paste the owner name from a deed and find out what kind of entity it is and how to reach the human behind it.

Open tool

SEC Marketing Rule Checker

Paste a LinkedIn post, bio, or website section and see what a compliance reviewer would flag under the SEC Marketing Rule.

Open tool

Stop doing this by hand

Plotbook is a map of who owns the wealth around you, with research that names the human behind an LLC or trust. Seven day trial, 100 credits, no demo call.

Start a free trial